Showing posts with label drinks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drinks. Show all posts

Thursday, 27 January 2011

How to make Strawberry Vodka Liqueur

Last summer we went strawberry picking. I enjoyed it so much I ended up with far too many strawberries. Some we ate fresh, of course – with and without cream. I made a lot into strawberry jam (though it didn't set so I have several jars of what I'm calling strawberry sauce for ice-cream!). And some went into strawberry ice-cream.

The rest I decided to make into strawberry vodka, having been inspired by friends' efforts.

ParksideStrawbPicking-2650 ParksideStrawbPicking-2655

First, I weighed my hulled and chopped strawberries. I wanted something sweet and rich so I used an equal weight of fruit and sugar. You can use less, of course – as little as half weight of the fruit. My friend recommended using about 1.25 to 1.5 times spirit to weight of fruit. I chose vodka but you can use gin, if you prefer.

With my three ingredients measured out, I divided them between five jars (somwhat approximately, since the jars were different sizes), sealed them tightly and left them in the (dark, cool) larder for just over 6 months.

StrawbVodka-2720 StrawbVodka-2721 StrawbVodka-2722

For the first few weeks, I shook and turned them once a week or so. After that, I left them untouched.

StrawbVodka-5617

By the time I went back to them, the colour had leached out of the fruit and into the vodka. The liquid seemed much more viscous than the original vodka.

StrawbVodka-5618

Pete had to help me open the jars; the lids on four of them were jammed on very tight indeed! I strained the contents through muslin straight into a large measuring jug, the easier to then bottle it.

StrawbVodka-5620 StrawbVodka-5621

I deliberately mixed the results of all five jars together as I figured some might be more or less sweet or more or less alcoholic, as I'd not shared the ingredients exactly according to the different jar sizes. I wanted a single finished liqueur.

The results are absolutely fantastic!

I've called it a strawberry vodka liqueur rather than just strawberry vodka because it's really thick and syrupy, very rich and sweet and has a really strong flavour.

We poured it into some saved alcohol bottles to store.

StrawbVodka-5622

I didn't make much as I didn't realise how fabulous it would be but my plan is to make lots more next strawberry season so that I can share it as gifts for friends.

P.S. The alcohol soaked fruit wasn't wasted – we had it alongside some home-made lemon posset that evening!

Homemade Strawberry Vodka Liqueur

Strawberries, chopped, hulled and weighed
Sugar (same weight as strawberries)
Vodka (1.25 times weight/volume of strawberries)

  • Combine ingredients and seal into an airtight glass jar.
  • For the first few weeks, shake and turn regularly, to help the sugar dissolve and flavours mix.
  • Leave to mature for at least 3-4 months; the longer the better.
  • Strain through muslin for a clearer finished result.
  • Bottle and enjoy for as long as it lasts!

Read More...

Thursday, 30 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Daas Beer

daas-1

Mainland Europe makes some wonderful beer, entirely unlike our own domestic ales – that is to say, the styles are entirely different, not that our domestic ales aren't equally wonderful!

Belgium, in particular, produces fantastic, big flavoured (and frequently strong!) beers which are always worth seeking out. (I'm partial to the occasional Kwak myself). But in the UK your options are fairly limited; I can only think of a handful of Belgian brews readily available.

Daas have been brewing beer for more than 900 years (which is fairly old even for a Belgian brewery) but have only recently started pushing into the UK market*. Having encountered them at a food show, I quickly bought some of everything and looked forward to a Belgian brewery tour. I hesitate to call this a proper "Tour-At-Home", because three small bottles hardly feels like a tour; nonetheless it's a sampling of the full range.

The range itself is organic, and bottle conditioned. It's missing a 'Brune', which you would have thought after 900 years they could have worked into their output, but that might be my prejudice showing!

daas-witte

First up is Daas Witte, a wheat beer at 5.0%. It’s a slightly murky, pale straw colour with a thick, lingering head. It smells of yeast, and fresh green fruit with a distinct sharpness. In the mouth it has a nice firm body, the refreshing yet strong taste you expect from a wheat beer, not very sweet with more hints of green fruit and just a slight bitter, dry finish. The bubbles fill your mouth in just the right way. Given that it doesn’t taste that sweet, there’s a strange lingering stickiness that you’d expect to come from something much sweeter. It’s curious; not bad, but I’m not blown away.

daas-blond

Next, Daas Blond, a traditional Belgian blond beer at 6.5%. Similarly murky, with a nice golden colour to it and a thinner but still quite lingering head. On the nose, there’s a sweet richness of malt, and more yeast. A similar mouthfeel to the Witte; that rich maltiness, almost honey is still there but there’s a curious acidity to the flavour too. There’s a definite darkness to the flavour which you wouldn’t necessarily expect from the colour alone - although to be fair it’s not unusual for a Belgian blonde. The bubbles are still a little intense, but I’m liking this one much more - although I’m not sure it compares favourably to, say, a Leffe.

daas-ambre

Finally, Daas Ambre, also at 6.5%. Unlike the others, this pours clear, in a rich amber tone with a thinner but still foamy head. It has a similar rich malty, almost toffee-like nose and taste. The mouthfeel, if anything, is lighter than the others, although you can still taste the strength. There’s a slightly unpleasant bitter tail to it; not with any real hoppiness, it’s just … bitter. It has an almost dry taste; it's a perfectly drinkable but it's an unremarkable Ambre.

To sum up then; there's nothing exactly wrong with any of these beers, but neither do they get me particularly excited.

Daas is available from myBreweryTap and various organic retailers for around £2.49 a bottle.


*We've been contacted by Daas Beer to make a correction to our post. They have been brewing beer for just 4 years, not 900, as we said above! We were thrown by the text on their website that reads "Das premium organic beers uphold our Belgian tradition of brewing excellence lasting more than 900 years" and even more by the "1096" in their logo. Both refer to the Belgian brewing tradition in general and not to Das Beer specifically!

DasBeer

Usually, We'd simply edit the original text. But we're curious – does anyone else think using the year 1096 in their logo more than implies that Daas themselves have been brewing since that time? Or that they are using a recipe from that date or even that their brewery is on a site that has been a brewery since that date...?

Read More...

Monday, 27 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Coach House Brewing Company Blueberry Classic Bitter

BlueberryBeer-0808

Name: Coach House Brewing Company Blueberry Classic Bitter

ABV: 5.0%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled, unconditioned

Colour: Pale

Head: Pours like a fizzy drink, with a head that didn't last long enough to photograph

Mouthfeel: Tizer

Taste: Overwhelming blueberry smell as you open the bottle, and that carries through to the taste as well; sweet, almost cordial-like.

Comment: Fruit beers have a lot in common with fruit teas; if the balance is right they can be delicious, but it's oh so easy to get them wrong. At one end of the spectrum you have beers (and teas) with a tantalising fruity aroma, but when you come to drink them they just taste of beer (or tea). While there's nothing with that - I'm a big fan of both beer and tea - I find the disconnect with smell and taste frustrating.

At the other end of the spectrum, we have things like this beer. The pure-fruit nose is reflected in a pure-fruit taste - it's closer to an alcopop than a beer; stickily sweet, fizzy, fruity with no hint of malt and just the barest hint of bitterness at the very end suggesting some light hopping. In itself, it's not an objectionable drink - but it's not really much like an actual beer.

BlueberryBeer-0810

Read More...

Sunday, 26 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Clemens ohne Filter (Unfiltered)

PeteDrinks-0801 PeteDrinks-0806

Name: Clemens ohne Filter (Unfiltered)

ABV: 5.4%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottle conditioned

Colour: Deep amber

Head: Fine bubbles feeding a lingering, foamy, good sized head.

Mouthfeel: Medium body, the bubbles lingering in the mouth without becoming fizzy.

Taste: Rich, full of sweet maltiness, with a warming alcohol sharpness.

Comment: As I've mentioned before, sometimes the fact that I'm known to like my beer, results in the joy of a friend bringing me their local brews to try. On this occasion the friend in question is from Bavaria and brought me a local beer I haven't even seen in my favourite online beer shop!

It's a delicious smelling beer with the sweetness of the malt and the yeastiness that comes from the bottle conditioning. Those smells strongly bring to my mind the smell of a brewery, giving you a connection to production often lacking in beer - although I often find that a good whisky's nose will transport me to the warehouse in a similar way.

It's just as delicious on drinking, with that deep, rich sticky sweet malt and a surprisingly strong alcohol edge to it; it manages to taste as if it's a fair bit stronger than the 5.4% on the bottle. The fine bubbles give a lovely texture in the mouth. "Very tasty, very drinkable" I have on my tasting notes, right next to urgent questions of "where can I find in this country?!".

The last word, however, has to go to the Haerle brewery themselves; my German is fairly rusty, so I shall let Google do the translation of the beer's tagline for me - "Clemens without a filter - the beer for ironing".

clemens unfiltered

OK, then.

Read More...

Sunday, 19 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Little Valley Ginger Pale Ale

PeteDrinks-6246

Name: Little Valley Ginger Pale Ale

ABV: 4.0%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled, conditioned

Colour: Golden

Head: Enthusiastic! Escaping from the bottle, but short lived in the glass

Mouthfeel: Light

Taste: Also light; better on the nose than the tongue

Comment: Little Valley are one of the few breweries who make a point of producing only certified organic beers - in this case, the beer is also Fair Trade (the ginger and sugar). When I saw that I was a little puzzled as to why you would need sugar to make Pale Ale - I still don't understand it, although I think it's reflected (and not in a good way) in the final product.

Now I love ginger. I love beer. A proper ginger beer (by which I mean, an actual beer fortified with ginger, rather than something like the most excellent Crabbie's Alcoholic Ginger Beer) is a fine thing indeed. This, however, isn't it.

On opening, the beer is escaping from the bottle - frankly, as this is bottle conditioned, I only take that as a good sign but in the glass the head is a big-bubbled, short lived affair that is gone by the time I'm drinking.

On the nose, there's plenty of great ginger, but in the mouth it's just a hint. There's no malt in evidence, a little bitterness, some citrus notes and, well, not much else. It smells the part, but then fails to deliver.

Looking back at my note on their Withens IPA, it seems that maybe the Little Valley brewers just don't like malt in their beer - unless I've just been unlucky with the ones I've picked so far.

PeteDrinks-6247

Read More...

Friday, 10 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Draft vs. Bottled - Fuller's London Pride

LondonPrideBottleCask-4955 LondonPrideBottleCask-4952

Name: Fuller's London Pride

ABV: 4.1% (draft) and 4.7% (bottled)

Bottled/ Draft: Both!

Colour: Consistent between both, a pale copper

Head: Thin but lingering on the draft; barely any on the bottle.

Mouthfeel: The fizz is strong on the bottle, a semi-lager which feels light. Much fuller body on the draft, no fizz at all and an almost creamy feel.

Initial Draft Taste: A light malt, distinct but without significant sweetness. The hops yield a wider mouthfeel and a nice bitter tail, but without any clear flavour notes of their own.

Initial Bottle Taste: More significant malt - although still not sweet - and the hops are much less in evidence. This, plus the fizz, makes it a much less interesting taste.

Initial Comment: After the last draft vs. bottled experiment, I've been eager to revisit this one - largely because I was so shocked by the original discovery that I preferred the bottled to the draft! As my local is a Fuller's I realised how easy this would be, because they have Pride on tap and also in bottles in the fridge. So, trying to ignore the slightly curious look I got from the nice girl behind the bar, I ordered one of each.

Instant observations; in terms of colour they're very similar. Other than that, the bottled is clearly fizzed (and sadly not through any sort of bottle conditioning...); looking at the label it's also apparently 0.6% stronger. It's been suggested that this is to preserve the flavour when the beer is pasteurised for bottling - my immediate response to that is "well bottle condition it then", but what do I know?

I'm not getting much of an aroma from either glass; either my nose is on the blink or Pride isn't big on smell!

On tasting; well, there's that same "different beers" feeling I got before - in a blind taste test I'd question if they were even from the same brewery let alone theoretically the same beer. The bottled version makes me feel I've ordered a lager, the draft is clearly an ale. Although the flavours are distinct, I think by far the biggest factors in this difference are the aggressive carbonation of the bottle, and the fact that it arrives at fridge temperature (presumably 0-4 degrees) and the draft is at a proper cellar temperature (mid-teens I'd hazard). The coldness of the bottle suppresses the hops, which makes the malt more obvious; the fizz makes the beer taste somehow "sharper".

I then enjoy lunch and leave both beers aside; after 30 minutes or so they've both warmed up (the bottled, obviously, more than the draft)

Final Draft Taste: the malt has faded as the hops have become more obvious; they're running all through the beer and there's another note there that I can't quite pin down. The best my tasting notes can do is "green"; it's not floral or fruity but there's a freshness about it. If I didn't know better (and given that they're brewing it to a different strength, I *don't* know better) I'd say they were using fresher hops (perhaps vs. pellets) in the draft.

Final Bottled Taste: again, the malt is less significant against the rising hop. Well balanced throughout, but without the extra, intriguing "green" notes I've found in the draft. The fizz has eased somewhat but it's still quite lager-like in body.

Final Comments: With the loss of at least some of those bubbles, and a rising temperature, the two beers are starting to taste, if not the same then at least like siblings. The draft has lot more going on, but it's probably still 5 degrees warmer than the bottle. If I had the patience I would leave the bottled one sat in the glass for an hour to see just how close the two could become.

Overall, I've got the result I expected the first time. The draft is nicer; it has a more complex flavour and a better mouthfeel. However, a lot of that seems to be down to the fact that the bottle version is served so cold, and that it's over-gassed. Left to settle for a while and the differences become much more subtle.

I can't do too much about the temperature (other than being patient!) - but next time I will try and find a pub which has the same beer in draft and bottle conditioned form!

LondonPrideBottleCask-4956 LondonPrideBottleCask-4958

Read More...

Pete Drinks: Three B's Knocker Up

PeteDrinks-6248

Name: Three B's Brewery Knocker Up Porter

ABV: 4.8%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled, conditioned

Colour: Deep, deep ruby

Head: Lingers like sea foam

Mouthfeel: Big, firm body

Taste: Deep roasted malt, almost syrupy.

Comment: This is a big headed beer - in a good way. I've got some small experience of pouring beer out of bottles, but even being careful I ended up with something like an 80% head in the glass! It's not so wildly enthusiastic that it escapes the bottle, and with some patience it settles down and leaves a wonderful looking foam cap.

Lots of rich chocolate malt on the nose and thick, sweet chocolaty malt on the tongue with a little subtle hoppiness. It's a wonderful porter with the sort of deep, rich sweetness that I love - surprisingly deep for something which is only 4.8%.

Very taste, very easy drinking, and very regrettable that I only bought one bottle.

PeteDrinks-6249 PeteDrinks-6250

Read More...

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Islay Ales' Bruichladdich 2008 Peat Ale #OpenIt

peat-ale-1 peat-ale-2

As a natural hoarder, I tend to have quite a few beers (and other drinks!) lurking in the back of cupboards, either being saved for a "special occasion" or because I'm just never in quite the right mood for it. It turns out that I'm not alone in this, because Mark Dredge over at Pencil and Spoon came up with the very sensible idea of creating a special occasion just for opening those bottles. He calls this community blog project OpenIt!

My OpenIt!, then, is Islay Ales' Bruichladdich 2008 Peat Ale, a 7.6%, bottle conditioned beer brewed especially for the Fèis Ìle – Islay's annual week long whisky and music festival. As I'm a huge Islay whisky fan, Kavey took me to Islay for my birthday a few years ago, which rather handily falls in Fèis Ìle. We returned for a second visit 2 years ago, again during the festival. Being a big beer fan as well, I had to visit the only brewery on the island, and came home with a couple of bottles of this very unique beer.

First, a quick whisky lesson. Whisky is, essentially, distilled beer. They make a beer, only rather than pouring it into casks and bottles, they put it into stills instead. Unlike for beer, the barley used for whisky is traditionally dried and malted over peat fires, which is what leads to the smokiness which is especially evident in Islay whiskies.

Islay Ales have developed a tradition of brewing a Peat Ale for the annual Fèis Ìle using malt that has had the heavy "peating" treatment usually reserved for whisky making, rather than regular beer-making malts. The result is a strong, smoke-filled brew which evokes more mental images of distilleries than of breweries.

On opening, it's quickly overflowing the bottle; it's a very lively beer - no doubt because it's 18 months past it's best before date. It pours a little murky, with the rather appropriate colour of a light Bruichladdich whisky; the head is fine and frothy with plenty of fine bubbles still rising. The smell is overpoweringly smoky, of bonfires but with a definite sweet malt underneath.

In the mouth, it's got a good firm body to it; the smoke is still pretty intense, lingering past most of the other flavours. The malt is sweet and subtle, and there's a real citrus lime tang with a dryness that leads into the smoke. It really doesn't taste like the 7.6% on the bottle. What it does taste like is that you're sipping a rather interesting beer whilst stood next to the peat fires of a distillery's malting floor.

It's a very odd beer, which I didn't particularly like when I originally tried it - and to be fair, I can still see why. The smoke is overpowering, and it comes dangerously close to tasting like some tyke has put out his cigar in your beer. It's *almost* delicious, and if they can cut back just a touch on the peat I'd be begging them to brew it all year around. Seems like a reason (if I needed one) to get back to Islay for another festival!

peat-ale-3

Read More...

Saturday, 4 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Bristol Beer Factory Tour-At-Home

bristol-beer-factory-1

I so enjoyed my first Tour-At-Home, working though Marble's beers, that it inspired me to do more in depth explorations of breweries.

I've been following the Bristol Beer Factory on Twitter for a little while, so when I stumbled across some of their bottles in Borough Market (at the excellent Utobeer stall, run by the owners of The Rake, a fantastic real ale pub just outside the Market) I grabbed one of everything they had - four different bottles, which represents round half of the brewery's bottled offerings.

As before, I've tried to arrange the beers in a reasonably sensible order, from light to dark rather than in strength order.

bristol-beer-factory-2 bristol-beer-factory-3 bristol-beer-factory-4 bristol-beer-factory-5

We start with "No. 7", a traditional English best bitter at 4.5%. Deep amber in colour, it pours with a nicely lingering, frothy head. It has a deliciously caramel or toffee nose on it which leads you into a sweet malt taste, with a tasty, lingering hoppy bitterness that balances it out perfectly. This is the only beer of the four which appears not to be bottle conditioned; there is a little fizz present, but it's well controlled and actually adds to the beer. All round, this does exactly what it says on the bottle - it's a very traditional style best bitter, and it's delicious. It's also going down at an alarming rate.

Next up, Bristol Hefe, a 4.8% German-style wheat beer. Before I get into the taste of this beer, can I just say that although I love my beer to be alive (we're now into the bottle conditioned beers), I am less enthusiastic about a beer that literally leaps out of the bottle when I try to open it. I lose a good two inches of beer in an admittedly pleasant smelling spray across the kitchen that I then have to waste time mopping up. Beer shouldn't be this lively.

Ok, rant over.

In the glass, it's a very murky pale gold; it looks rather like set honey. Wheat beers tend to be murky, and the beer explosion probably mixed in the yeast to a huge extent too. The head is little more than a smear, which considering the volume of foam I just had to wipe up is surprising. It smells exactly as a wheat beer should; yeasty and sweet - and there's something else, almost pine needles. On drinking, I'm glad to see the foam hasn't gone completely to waste and there's lots of champagne-like bubbles filling the mouth. It's tangy, with hints of citrus orange and even zest. I'm not really getting the banana notes that the bottle (and every other review!) suggests, but maybe that's just me. Even so, it's a very good example of a wheat beer - I just wish more of it had ended up in my glass and less on my floor.

On to Exhibition, a classic, strong, dark English Ale coming in at 5.2%. This sounds right up my street, but I open it very cautiously over the sink after my fun with the Hefe. It turns out my paranoia is unwarranted; the beer is virtually flat and pours with no head at all. It has a deep, dark red tone to it and smells wonderful; rich, sweet coffee and dark chocolate malt. It tastes just as good; bitter chocolate, a hint of coffee, roasted almost burnt sugar, and dark fruits. It's not as flat on the tongue as it looks in the glass either; there's some nice gentle bubbles lurking there. It's not as sweet as the nose suggests, and with a lighter body than you might expect from such a dark ale. Very tasty; I can see how it's won awards!

Lastly, Bristol Stout, at 4%. Another relatively flat pouring beer; black as a stout should be and virtually no head. A big nose of deeply roasted malts, perhaps a little less complex than the Exhibition. On tasting, it's another light body. The roast is still there but not so much else. There's a distinct bitter tail to it, but it takes some time to kick in - it's rather odd, the beer starts out with a fairly simple roasted maltiness and it's not until you've swallowed that you suddenly get this quite heavy bitterness jumping up at you. It's quite a nice beer, but it's not as heavy as I expect a stout to be and that big bitter tail is unusual.

Overall, a very interesting collection of beers; tasty and well crafted, and I'll certainly be keeping an eye open for their many other beers the next time I'm near a stockist!

Read More...

Thursday, 2 December 2010

Pete Drinks: Meantime London Lager & Coffee Porter

meantime-1 meantime-3

Name: Meantime London Lager

ABV: 4.5%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled

Colour: Pale gold

Head: Bubbly but with a short lived head.

Mouthfeel: Lots of bubbles, but not horribly fizzy.

Taste: A tasty lager, with a little more malt, plenty more hops and overall more *flavour* to it than the big names.

Comment: Meantime are one of the leading lights of the lively London brewing scene, having been one of the first of the "new" breweries to open, just over a decade ago. They've been picking up awards and accolades for their beers ever since. A lot of their range has a distinctly European taste but they are very keen to underline their roots, so London Lager joins the London Porter, Stout and Pale Ales in their range.

Don't let the lager in the name put you off; this isn't the insipid, fizzy water lager of the big brands. This is a proper beer that lets the flavour of the ingredients shine through and wears it's European heritage with pride.

As I usually drink my beer at cupboard temperature (our larder manages to sit at a low to mid teens temperature almost regardless of the changing of the seasons, which is handy), my first taste of London Lager was not in the traditional 'chilled' lager style. It has the normal lager fizz, but not negatively so (it is, after all, a lager!); it has a distinct if gentle malt, and a distinct hoppy bitter end that adds a pleasant complexity that is rather less normal.

To give it a more 'lagery' tasting, I also stored a bottle in the fridge. Drunk cold, the malt is more subtle but still there, and the fruity, almost grapefruit hoppiness is still in evidence. It's as refreshing as a cold lager should be, but there's something more to it than you'd expect from more mainstream offerings.

I'm not a complete real ale snob - I usually have a box or two of lager lurking around (Tusker and Asahi at the moment, if I'm not mistaken) because not every night is a real ale night. I'll be happy to add a box of London Lager to the shopping list too.

meantime-2

Name: Meantime Coffee Porter

ABV: 6.0%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled

Colour: Dark, but more of a ruby ale than a porter in look.

Head: VERY lively (it literally exploded out of the bottle); pours with a big head, settles down (once you've cleaned up the kitchen from opening it) to a fine, thin but lingering head.

Mouthfeel: On the light side for a porter, a little harshness of bubble, surprisingly.

Taste: A strong tasting ale, with definite coffee undertones.

Comment: A curious beer this; on the one hand it delivers exactly what I'd expect; a robust, strong tasting ale, deep dark malts and a perfectly balanced coffee tang. On the other hand, I'm not sure this is really dark enough to be a porter. It's a delicious beer, it's just not quite what I was expecting from the label.

meantime-4

Interestingly, it appears from their website that Meantime agree with me, as this now appears to be listed as simply "Coffee Beer"

Read More...

Saturday, 13 November 2010

Pete Drinks: Marble Brewery Tour-At-Home

One of the many joys of writing this blog is that people have a tendency to tell you about their favourite small brewery, which is often a new discovery. If you're extra lucky, that person is so enthusiastic that they'll haul back a selection of said brewery's products for you, which is why I have five intriguing bottles from the Marble Brewery, a micro brewer in Manchester.

Marble have been around for a few years, and although they haven't appeared in my local supermarkets all the way down south, they're well represented in the various online shops that are starting to make tracking down interesting small brews so much easier. I think the bottles I have cover all their regular brews, although as their website isn't yet up and running it's a little hard to know just what they have available.

All of their beers are bottle conditioned (hooray!) and a number of them are organic as well.

marble-manchester-bitter marble-ginger marble-ipa marble-dobber marble-chocolate
Manchester Bitter, Ginger 6%, Lagonda IPA, Dobber and Chocolate Marble

On to the beers, then. I've attempted to go from light to dark, in the interest of being up to at least some sort of sense by the time I reach bottle number 5.

We open, then, with Manchester Bitter, at 4.2%. A surprisingly light, almost straw coloured beer, far lighter than I was expecting. The initial head is a little concerning with large, fizzy-drink style bubbles but left to sit for a few minutes, these form a pleasingly foamy, lingering head. Big, strong hoppy aromas, almost fruity. Those hops are just as big hitting when it comes to the flavour as well, a delicious floral bitterness that lingers but doesn't overstay it's welcome. The beer has a smooth, almost velvety texture and it all comes together to form a delicious, very quaffable ale. Over time as it sits in the glass, more citrusy notes become apparent, although it requires considerable self control to leave it long enough for that! If this is in any way representative of their range, I'm going to have a very pleasant afternoon.

In fact my only real criticism is the name; it's very pale for what I'd expect from something labelled as a Manchester bitter. It should have said "Spring Ale". In fact, I might have to order myself a box in the spring!

Next up is Ginger 6%, which is (obviously) 6%. A slightly darker, Golden Syrup colour, less fizzy out of the bottle and only a light film of foam lingering. Lots and lots of ginger aroma initially - pretty much to the exclusion of any other hints. This fades pretty quickly to a more general hint of gingeriness, which leads through to a subtle ginger taste. There's a clear 'beery' base with just a slight tang of ginger on the tongue. There's a certain sweetness to it, but not so much that it overwhelms the beer flavours. There's a bitterness to it as well, but not the good, hoppy kind, and the mouthfeel is a little odd - almost soapy - which makes me wonder if perhaps the bottle is a little long in the tooth.

An exciting smelling beer when first poured, this one doesn't really deliver for me.

And so, on to the Lagonda IPA, 5%. Pale gold (just a little darker than the Manchester Bitter) with a more open head. Buckets of malt and hops on the nose, but with less of the floral, fruity overtones of the Bitter. The taste reflects those, with a decent malt punch nicely balanced by buckets of hoppy bitterness and a slightly more pronounced citrus edge. Not as velvety at the bitter, with a light but not watery body. There is a darker fruitiness to the taste and an almost honey-like (or maybe a light caramel) sweetness.

Another excellent beer; less seasonal tasting than the Bitter and after the wobble with the Ginger, I'm starting to see why Marble have such a passionate following.

Next up is Dobber at 5.9%. Another pale golden beer, this time with virtually no head on it. A wonderful collection of smells; fruity, floral, hoppy. All of these come through in spades when tasting; a flavoursome, medium bodied beer dripping with maltiness, heavy hitting hops, nice fruit notes and a lingering bitterness. You can taste the higher strength through it all, and everything comes together to give a very well constructed beer.

Another big winner - probably my favourite of the lot.

Finally, the Chocolate Marble, 5.5%. A black stout, with a thin but lingering fine head. The sweet, chocolate maltiness is very apparent on the nose - when it comes to tasting it, those flavours remain, with burnt sugar present as well. Those burnt notes lead into a nice bitter touch. A good, rich flavour but retaining a relatively light body; not as sickly and sludgy as stouts can sometimes become, although some might find it almost too light. My tasting notes have "very drinkable" and "yummy" scrawled all over them.

Once again, a delicious beer; Marble wisely allowing the chocolate malt to do the talking and resisting the urge to get clever.

So, the final score is four excellent beers, and one miss. Looking around, my experience with the Ginger 6 is atypical, which makes me even more suspicious that I had a bad one - I shall have to keep my eye out for another bottle and give it a second chance.

It's an interesting collection of well crafted, tasty beers and even bottles even look stylish.

Price:

These were bought for £3.25 each from behind the bar at the Marble Arch pub (73 Rochdale Rd, Manchester, M4 4HY). They can also be bought from the Marble Beer House (57 Manchester Road, Chorlton, M21 0UE) or the 57 Thomas Street pub (57 Thomas Street, Northern Quarter, Manchester M4 1NA).

Alternatively, they can be purchased online by the case from where 12 bottles cost £27 + £6 postage. That's £2.75 a bottle.

Read More...

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

Pete Drinks: Badger Golden Champion

PeteDrinks-6240

Name: Badger Golden Champion

ABV: 5%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled, not conditioned

Colour: Amber

Head: Large bubbles form a short live head

Mouthfeel: Light without becoming watery

Taste: Gentle malt, with the floral sweetness of the elderflower

Comment: The fizz clears quickly from this beer, so it avoids becoming too gassy. All the individual components - the malt, the hops, even the elderflower - are delicate and subtle, and go together to produce a light, refreshing and dangerously drinkable bottle. Somehow, it manages to deliver a satisfying, complex flavour without losing the lightness required for a great summer beer.

There's a noticeable sweetness, almost honey, which combines wonderfully with the flowery overtones contributed by the elderflower. As a refreshing summer ale, there's only really one word to fairly describe this - Champion!

PeteDrinks-6242

Read More...

Saturday, 30 October 2010

Pete Drinks: Wolf Brewery Battle of Britain RAF

bob 20101012-0756

Name: Wolf Brewery Battle of Britain RAF

ABV: 3.9%

Bottled/ Draft: Bottled, not conditioned

Colour: Copper

Head: Very short lived

Mouthfeel: Full bodied

Taste: Nicely bitter, light on the malt.

Comment: This is one of four beers that Wolf have brewed specially to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Battle of Britain - a series of ales made to honour 'The Few', of whom 544 lost their lives during the period of the Battle.

Initially a little fizzy – an artifact of bottling, I'm sure – but otherwise this is a very drinkable, traditional style of bitter. Fairly light on the malt, but retaining a good body nonetheless. There's a very nice floral hoppy nose, which leads through to a nicely balanced bitterness; this is how a good beer should taste!

I've seen Wolf around at various food and drink events before, but I've never got around to sampling their beers until now; on the basis of this one, I'm determined to explore more of their surprisingly extensive range (I count no less than 14 beers listed on their website, not counting the four Battle of Britain beers); if this one is anything to go by, they clearly know their beer!

As part of their commemorations, Wolf Brewery will be donating 10 pence per bottle to the Royal Air Forces Association’s Wings Appeal.

bob 20101012-0757

The Battle of Britain beers are available from Wolf Brewery's online shop for £28.50 a case (£2.38 per bottle). Other stockists are also listed on the website.

Read More...